Australia’s leading institute for women’s leadership is urging all political parties and independents to commit to implementing the Independent review into Commonwealth Parliamentary workplaces led by Kate Jenkins. 

The Global Institute for Women’s Leadership (GIWL) at The Australian National University (ANU) says the so-called Jenkins review offers clear reforms to make all parliamentary workplaces safer. 

“There isn’t a minute to waste,” ANU GIWL Director Professor Michelle Ryan said. “All workplaces should be safe for women. It’s simply not good enough that they still aren’t, especially Parliament. 

“We often speak about needing more women working in our parliament, both as MPs and as staff.  But gender equality is not just about the number of women in a workplace; it is also about the nature of the women’s experiences in those workplaces. 

“At the moment, one of the major barriers to gender equality is women feeling unsafe in their workplaces. The Jenkins review provides a blueprint on how to change this. Our political leaders must now make it happen. 

“GIWL stands ready to assist in any way to support the review’s full and urgent implementation.”

ANU is the first international node of GIWL, originally established and led by former Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard and based at King’s College London. The institute is committed to improving workplace gender equality in Australia, the Asia-Pacific and globally. 

“It’s time to change our federal parliament forever. We need a code of conduct and an effective way of receiving and acting on complaints. The Jenkins review gives us this,” Ms Gillard said. 

“We need all political parties to work together with urgency and ambition and commit to deliver the bold reforms that are needed.” 

Ms Brittany Higgins, who joined ANU GIWL as its inaugural visiting fellow earlier this year, said she was pleased to see the review deliver its report and hoped it “inspired immediate action”. 

“I want to thank the many brave people who shared their stories which contributed to this review. I hope all sides of politics not only commit to but implement these recommendations in full,” Ms Higgins said. 

A key component of the review is proposed codes of conduct for parliamentary workplaces.

“This is an especially important element in making sure our parliamentary workplaces are safer,” Professor Ryan said. “So it is encouraging to see this also included in the review’s recommendations. 

“This is vital to helping prevent abuse, harassment and sexual misconduct in Parliament, and ensuring we respond appropriately if it does happen.” 

You may also like

Article Card Image

Democracy Sausage: Divided nation — the Voice vote explained

Researchers Nicholas Biddle and Valerie Cooms join the show to discuss new research on the referendum and why it was rejected at the polls.

Article Card Image

Voters rejected Voice due to fears of division: ANU study

Two-in-three Australians who voted ‘no’ to a Voice to Parliament said they rejected the proposed constitutional change because it would divide the nation.

Article Card Image

Vast majority of voters still think First Nations Australians should have a voice

Almost nine-in-10 voters, 87 per cent, think First Nations Australians should have a voice or say over matters that affect them, despite the defeat of the proposed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament.

Subscribe to ANU Reporter

Anu Logo

+61 2 6125 5111

The Australian National University, Canberra

CRICOS Provider: 00120C

ABN: 52 234 063 906

EDX Logo
Group of eight Australia Logo