Young Australians are turning to the courts to drive action on climate change, Claudia Hodge reports.

Australia’s commitments (or lack thereof) at COP26 put a dampener on much-needed ambitions to limit global heating to 1.5 degrees Celsius. But this should not be reason to give up hope for meaningful climate action in Australia. In the face of lacklustre progress from the Federal Government, Australians are pursuing other avenues to drive change.   

The number of climate-related court cases filed in Australia soared to 123 as of November 2021, and Australian courts have shown an increased willingness to consider the impacts of climate change in their legal reasoning processes. More promising still is that many of the most high-profile climate cases in Australia have been led by youth activists. If the following cases are anything to go by, the expansion of climate litigation in Australia is here to stay.

A duty of care

In May 2021, the Federal Court of Australia recognised that the Commonwealth Environment Minister, in considering whether to grant approval for the expansion of an existing coal mine in northwestern NSW, owes a duty of care to Australian children. More specifically, the court held that the minister is under an obligation to take reasonable care to avoid causing harm to Australian children by sanctioning additional greenhouse gas emissions.   

Led by eight young Australians on behalf of all children born before the proceedings started, Sharma v Minister for the Environment is a landmark decision recognising the real and foreseeable risk of harm posed by climate change, and holding the Federal Government to account for its failure to adequately guard against that risk.   

The minister has since lodged an appeal, heard by the Full Federal Court in October, denying her duty of care owed to Australian children — an act the youth litigants labelled as “embarrassing”.  While the Full Federal Court is yet to hand down its final decision, if the minister’s appeal is dismissed and the original decision upheld, the case would set a favourable precedent for constraining the Australian Government’s power to approve fossil fuel projects going forward.

Fighting for human rights

Youth Verdict— a coalition of young people fighting for climate justice in accordance with First Nations rights — raised an objection against Waratah Coal’s Galilee Coal Project in Queensland, on the basis the development infringes human rights protected under the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld). Waratah Coal, owned by Clive Palmer, attempted to have the objection struck out by the Land Court of Queensland, but the court dismissed the company’s application in September 2020.   

The substantive legal questions raised by Youth Verdict’s objection are still to be decided by the court, but if victorious, the case will become the first in Australia to successfully use human rights as a basis for curbing the coal industry’s contribution to climate change. It would also set a valuable precedent for others in Australia to take action on climate change by asserting their human rights to life and culture.

The bottom line

Youth Verdict— a coalition of young people fighting for climate justice in accordance with First Nations rights — raised an objection against Waratah Coal’s Galilee Coal Project in Queensland, on the basis the development infringes human rights protected under the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld). Waratah Coal, owned by Clive Palmer, attempted to have the objection struck out by the Land Court of Queensland, but the court dismissed the company’s application in September 2020.   

The substantive legal questions raised by Youth Verdict’s objection are still to be decided by the court, but if victorious, the case will become the first in Australia to successfully use human rights as a basis for curbing the coal industry’s contribution to climate change. It would also set a valuable precedent for others in Australia to take action on climate change by asserting their human rights to life and culture. 

Claudia Hodge is a student at the ANU College of Law and Youth Co-Chair of the Australian Lawyers for Human Rights Environment and Human Rights Sub-Committee. 

Top image: Markus Spiske/Unsplash

You may also like

Article Card Image

Democracy Sausage: the state and democracy

This week we are returning to the building blocks of politics and democracy, as philosopher Philip Pettit joins Mark Kenny to question assumptions.

Article Card Image

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is determined to advance reconciliation

The Prime Minister reflected on the outcome of the Voice referendum on an episode of ANU podcast Democracy Sausage.

Article Card Image

Democracy Sausage: Anthony Albanese on two years in the top job

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese joins Democracy Sausage to reflect on two years in office.

Subscribe to ANU Reporter